Legal Opinion

Continental Collection & Disposal, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided October 6, 1993No. 91-1536CPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HORN, Judge.

BACKGROUND

This action comes before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment, based on plaintiff’s failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted. Plaintiff alleges that defendant breached the contract between the parties by failing to exercise options to extend the contract for additional years. Plaintiff requests damages to compensate for those years. Defendant denies plaintiff’s allegations and asserts that the government properly exercised its right, based on the contract, not to renew the contract for additional years.

After careful consideration of…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. United States Department of State v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1991

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Mantech Telecommunications & Information Systems Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
  2. Krygoski Construction Company, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  3. Dangfeng Shen Ho v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
  4. Morris v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
  5. Libertatia Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API