Legal Opinion
Krygoski Construction Company, Inc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided November 7, 1996No. 95-5136PublishedCited by 93 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Circuit Judge.
The United States Court of Federal Claims determined that the United States Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) had no justification for terminating a demolition contract with KrygosM Construction Company, Inc. (KrygosM) for the Government’s convenience. Krygoski Constr. Co. v. United States, No. 214-89C (Fed.Cl. March 2, 1993). To remedy the breach, the trial court awarded KrygosM $1,456,851.10 in damages plus interest pending payment. Krygoski Constr. Co. v. United States, No. 214-89C (Fed.Cl. May 19, 1995). Because the trial court incorrectly relied on Torncello v. United…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Keco Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- Torncello v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- Kalvar Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- John Reiner & Company, Individually and to the Use of Kurz & Root Company (Incorporated) v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- United States v. SpeedSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- bell/heery v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Textron, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- International Data Products Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense v. Freedom Ny, Inc., Freedom Ny, Inc. v. Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Cybertech Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.