Mantech Telecommunications & Information Systems Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALLEGRA, Judge.
This bid protest action is before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record. Plaintiff avers that prejudicial errors occurred during the selection process involving the solicitation in question. At issue is whether corrective action proposed by the defendant in response to those alleged errors is arbitrary, capricious or otherwise contrary to law. After careful consideration of the briefs filed by the parties, the extensive oral argument, and for the reasons discussed below, the court GRANTS, IN PART, and DENIES, IN PART,…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by147 opinions
- Systems Application & Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Banknote Corp. of America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Textron, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Serco Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- DMS All-Star Joint Venture v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
142 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.