Mark C. Newkirk v. Donald A. Lulejian, Alphonse W. Faure and Eugene F. Fijalkowski
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.
The decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, awarding priority of invention in Interference No. 101,000 to Donald A. Lulejian et al., inventors of the subject matter claimed in U.S. Patent No. 4,313,750, is affirmed.
OPINION
Count 1, the only independent count, is representative:
1. A camless electronic glassware conveyor delivery apparatus having pushout robot means being in operative association with glassware forming apparatus having at least one synchronous operation point, comprising:
camless electronic…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Correge v. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Wiesner v. WeigertCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
- Chandler v. MockCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945
- Kroekel v. ShahCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
- Hummer v. Administrator of the National Aeronautics & Space AdministrationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- F. Brantley Scott and John H. Burton v. Roy P. FinneyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Holmwood v. SugavanamCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Dsl Dynamic Sciences Limited v. Union Switch & Signal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Streck, Inc. v. Research & Diagnostic Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- EI DuPont De Nemours and Co. v. Monsanto Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.