Legal Opinion
EI DuPont De Nemours and Co. v. Monsanto Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided August 18, 1995No. Civ. A. 92-625(LON), 93-263(LON)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LONGOBARDI, Chief Judge.
I. NATURE AND STAGE OF THE PROCEEDINGS
This is a consolidated action for patent infringement which for all practical purposes amounted to three separate trials divided into two phases. In the first phase of this case, BASF Corporation (“BASF”) alleges that E.I. DuPont De Nemours and Company (“DuPont”) infringes Claim 5 of United States Patent No. 4,374,641 (“the Burlone patent”), which is owned by BASF. DuPont denies infringement and contends that the Burlone patent is invalid.
In the second phase of this case, DuPont alleges that BASF and Monsanto Company (“Monsanto”)…
2Cases cited74 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- American Hoist & Derrick Company, Cross-Appellee v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Hybritech Incorporated v. Monoclonal Antibodies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Procter & Gamble Co. v. Paragon Trade Brands, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1997
- Cohesive Technologies, Inc. v. Waters Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
- Glaxo Wellcome, Inc. v. Pharmadyne Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1998
- Verizon California Inc. v. Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P.District Court, C.D. California · 2003
- W.R. Grace & Co.-Conn. v. Intercat, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.