Kroekel v. Shah
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MARKEY, Chief Judge.
Senior party Kroekel appeals from the decision of the Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Interferences (board) in interference No. 98,607 awarding priority of invention to junior party Shah on the ground that Kroekel had no right to make the counts. We reverse.
This interference involves application serial No. 335,999,1 entitled “Unsaturated Polyester Resins Containing Cellulose Ester and Molded Articles Therefrom,” filed February 26, 1973, for reissue of Kroekel U.S. patent No. 3,642,672, which issued from application serial No. 878,920,2 filed November 21, 1969,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fontijn v. OkamotoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
- Stansbury v. BondCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- Eckert v. WilliamsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
3Cited by6 opinions
- Peter J. Degeorge v. Donald R. BernierCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Reese v. HurstCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
- In re BaxterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
- Mark C. Newkirk v. Donald A. Lulejian, Alphonse W. Faure and Eugene F. FijalkowskiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Warren E. Davis and Donald W. Granger v. Stanley B. Loesch, James C. St. John, and Danny K. MintsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.