Legal Opinion

Chandler v. Mock

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 22, 1945No. Patent Appeal 5000PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’CONNELL, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal by Chandler from an award of priority of invention to Mock in a decision of the Board of Interference Examiners of the United States Patent Office.

The interference involves appellant Chandler’s patent No. 2,228,000, granted January 7, 1941, on his application filed May 2, 1938, and appellee Mock’s application, Serial No. 362,572, filed October 24, 1940, as a continuation of his application, Serial No. 118,718, filed January 2, 1937.

The subject matter of the invention pertains to a carburetor and is sufficiently described in the sole count in issue,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Marconi Wireless Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Marconi Wireless Telegraph Company of America v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Payne v. HurleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
  5. MacGregor v. JohnstonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mark C. Newkirk v. Donald A. Lulejian, Alphonse W. Faure and Eugene F. FijalkowskiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  2. Burns v. CurtisCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
  3. Technical Development Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
  4. Balogh v. CrotCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
  5. Ethicon Endo-Surgery v. United States Surgical Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API