Legal Opinion
Streck, Inc. v. Research & Diagnostic Systems, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided October 20, 2011No. 2011-1045PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is from the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska, deciding the question of priority of invention in an action brought under 35 U.S.C. § 146 (“Civil action in case of interference”). The district court awarded priority to the senior party, Streck, Inc. 1 The junior party, Research & Diagnostic Systems, Inc. (“R & D”), appeals, raising questions concerning (1) the procedures, burdens, and standards for a § 146 action, and (2) the correctness of the district court’s decision. The district court’s award of priority is…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Winner International Royalty Corporation v. Ching-Rong WangCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Z4 Technologies, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Streck, Inc. v. Research & Diagnostic Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Abbvie Deutschland GmbH & Co., KG v. Janssen Biotech, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Troy v. Samson Manufacturing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Polara Engineering Inc v. Campbell CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Helsinn Healthcare S.A. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.