Legal Opinion

Tompkins v. District Boundary Board

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1947PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

This is a proceeding under the uniform declaratory judgments act (§ 6-601 to 6-616, inc., O. C. L. A.), to obtain an adjudication of the validity of § 111-3143, O. C. L. A., as amended by chapter 253, Oregon Laws 1945. From a judgment on the pleadings, declaring the amendment unconstitutional, defendants, School District No. 94 of Yamhill County, the directors and clerk thereof, Dayton Union High School District No. 4 of Yamhill County, and the directors and clerk thereof, have appealed.

Jake Tompkins, Jr., owner of real property and a taxpayer in School District No. 94 is plaintiff, and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. RogersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  2. State v. ShawOregon Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Lovejoy v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Temple v. City of PetersburgSupreme Court of Virginia · 1944
  5. State Ex Rel. Pardee v. LatouretteOregon Supreme Court · 1942

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. FugateOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. City of Portland v. GoodwinOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Portland General Electric Co. v. City of EstacadaOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  4. State v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  5. Federal Cartridge Corp. v. HelstromOregon Supreme Court · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API