Tompkins v. District Boundary Board
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.
This is a proceeding under the uniform declaratory judgments act (§ 6-601 to 6-616, inc., O. C. L. A.), to obtain an adjudication of the validity of § 111-3143, O. C. L. A., as amended by chapter 253, Oregon Laws 1945. From a judgment on the pleadings, declaring the amendment unconstitutional, defendants, School District No. 94 of Yamhill County, the directors and clerk thereof, Dayton Union High School District No. 4 of Yamhill County, and the directors and clerk thereof, have appealed.
Jake Tompkins, Jr., owner of real property and a taxpayer in School District No. 94 is plaintiff, and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. RogersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
- State v. ShawOregon Supreme Court · 1892
- Lovejoy v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Temple v. City of PetersburgSupreme Court of Virginia · 1944
- State Ex Rel. Pardee v. LatouretteOregon Supreme Court · 1942
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. FugateOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- City of Portland v. GoodwinOregon Supreme Court · 1949
- Portland General Electric Co. v. City of EstacadaOregon Supreme Court · 1952
- State v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- Federal Cartridge Corp. v. HelstromOregon Supreme Court · 1954
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.