Legal Opinion

State v. Fugate

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 2001No. CC 96-0660-C; CA A96628; SC S45976PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

This is a criminal case in which defendant was charged with driving while under the influence of intoxicants (DUII). ORS 813.010. Defendant filed a pretrial motion to suppress any evidence of his impairment due to alcohol, arguing that any such evidence was obtained only because the arresting officer exceeded the permissible scope of the traffic stop that preceded defendant’s arrest. See ORS 810.410(3)(b) (1995) (limiting scope of traffic stop). The trial court granted defendant’s motion to suppress. On appeal, the state asserted, inter alia, that Oregon Laws 1997, chapter 313 (hereafter…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  2. Carmell v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Satterlee v. MatthewsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  4. Armatta v. KitzhaberOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Warren v. MARION COUNTYOregon Supreme Court · 1960

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. TerryOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. ShawOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. AcremantOregon Supreme Court · 2005

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API