Legal Opinion

Portland General Electric Co. v. City of Estacada

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1952PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLatourette, J.

Appeal by the city of Estacada from a decree restraining and enjoining it from including within its boundaries the “River Mill Plant” belonging to plaintiff which the city sought to annex under ch. 210, Oregon Laws 1949. The decree held that the annexation proceedings were void as to plaintiff’s property since they were instituted for the sole purpose of taxing plaintiff’s land and were unreasonable and unlawful, and also enjoined the assessor and the sheriff from assessing the property and collecting taxes on it, respectively.

The city’s first proposition, raised on appeal for the first time…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Vestal v. Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  2. State v. Port of TillamookOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Thurber v. McMinnvilleOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  4. City of Burlingame v. County of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Webb v. Clatsop County School District No. 3Oregon Supreme Court · 1950

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Mobil Oil Corporation v. Local Boundary CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  2. City of Aurora v. BRYANTIndiana Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Mutz v. Municipal Boundary CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Reafsnyder v. City of WarsawIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Morsman v. City of MadrasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API