Legal Opinion
City of Portland v. Goodwin
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided September 13, 1949PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRAND, A. C. J.
The issue in this case involves the alleged unconstitutionality of an ordinance of the City of Portland which reads as follows:
“Between the hours of 1:00 and 5:00 o’clock A. M., Pacific Standard time, it shall be unlawful for any person to roam or be upon any street, alley or public place without having and disclosing a lawful purpose.” Ordinance No. 76339, Section 16-617.
The defendants are husband and wife. Under the provisions of the ordinance each of them was charged by a complaint in the following language:
“The above named defendant on Sept. 2, 1947, within the corporate…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Nash v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Fox v. GallowayOregon Supreme Court · 1944
- Tozer v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1892
- Pinkerton v. VerbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- American Federation of Labor v. BainOregon Supreme Court · 1940
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- United States v. Philip Vita and Jerald CarmelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- People v. RiveraNew York Court of Appeals · 1964
- City of Seattle v. DrewWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Hattie Mae Ricks v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Bykofsky v. Borough of MiddletownDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.