Legal Opinion

Federal Cartridge Corp. v. Helstrom

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1954PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTooze, J.

This is a suit for an injunction and for damages, brought by plaintiff Federal Cartridge Corporation against Henning Helstrom, dba Foster Sporting Goods, as defendant. Decree was entered in favor of defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff is the manufacturer of certain shotgun shells which are sold in the state of Oregon and elsewhere, and which bear plaintiff’s exclusive registered trademarks and brand names of “Hi-Power” and “Monark”. Acting pursuant to the provisions of §§ 43-401 to 43-404, inch, OCLA (ORS 646.310 to 646.370, inch), commonly known as the “Fair Trade Law”, plaintiff…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Schwegmann Bros. v. Calvert Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. New State Ice Co. v. LiebmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Old Dearborn Distributing Co. v. Seagram-Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Tyson & Brother v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Planned Parenthood Ass'n v. Department of Human ResourcesOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Oregon Medical Ass'n v. RawlsOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Tharalson v. State Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. General Electric Co. v. Kimball Jewelers, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
  5. General Electric Co. v. WattleOregon Supreme Court · 1956

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API