Legal Opinion

Columbia Oldsmobile, Inc. v. City of Montgomery

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1990No. 89-1132PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Per curiam

This case presents the question of whether a trial court must uphold a municipal zoning ordinance when there is competent, credible evidence that the ordinance allows the landowners to retain an economically viable use of their land and that the ordinance substantially advances a legitimate governmental interest in the health, safety or welfare of the community. We answer this question in the affirmative. Thus, we must reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and reinstate the decision of the trial court.

“* * * In order to invalidate a zoning regulation on constitutional grounds, the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Goldblatt v. Town of HempsteadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Gerijo, Inc. v. City of FairfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Shemo v. Mayfield HeightsOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Goldberg Companies, Inc. v. Council of the City of Richmond HeightsOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Central Motors Corp. v. City of Pepper PikeOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Goldberg Cos., Inc. v. Richmond Hts. City CouncilOhio Supreme Court · 1998

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API