Legal Opinion

Gerijo, Inc. v. City of Fairfield

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1994No. Nos. 93-1300 and 93-1434PublishedCited by 99 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.

In Columbia Oldsmobile, Inc. v. Montgomery (1990), 56 Ohio St.3d 60, 564 N.E.2d 455, this court held that in order to invalidate a zoning ordinance on constitutional grounds, the party attacking the regulation must establish, beyond fair debate, that the zoning classification denies him or her an economically viable use of the zoned property without substantially advancing a legitimate interest in the health, safety or welfare of the community. The question certified for our review is whether the two elements of this test must be proven in the conjunctive or the disjunctive. For the reasons…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Village of Belle Terre v. BoraasSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by99 opinions

  1. City of Hubbard ex rel. Creed v. SaulineOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State ex rel. Shemo v. City of Mayfield HeightsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Goldberg Companies, Inc. v. Council of the City of Richmond HeightsOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Central Motors Corp. v. City of Pepper PikeOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State ex rel. Shemo v. Mayfield Hts.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API