Goldberg Cos., Inc. v. Richmond Hts. City Council
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 81 Ohio St.3d 207.] GOLDBERG COMPANIES, INC., APPELLANT, v. COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND HEIGHTS, APPELLEE. [Cite as Goldberg Cos., Inc. v. Richmond Hts. City Council,
1998-Ohio-456.] Municipal corporations—Zoning—Zoning regulation presumed to be constitutional, when—No distinction between area and use regulations in terms of standard for a constitutional challenge. A zoning regulation is presumed to be constitutional unless determined by a court to be clearly arbitrary and unreasonable and without substantial relation to the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Nectow v. City of CambridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Karches v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State ex rel. Shelly Materials, Inc. v. Clark County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- State ex rel. Shemo v. Mayfield Hts.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
- State ex rel. Shemo v. Mayfield Hts.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
- State ex rel. BSW Dev. Group v. DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Shemo v. Mayfield Hts.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.