Legal Opinion

Central Motors Corp. v. City of Pepper Pike

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1995No. 94-375PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCook, J.

In this case we are asked to determine whether Pepper Pike’s zoning of CMC’s property is unconstitutional and whether Pepper Pike had used its one opportunity to rezone to cure the constitutional defect, thereby allowing the judicial rezoning of the property. We hold that the zoning ordinance is constitutional and, thus, do not reach the issue of whether judicial rezoning was proper.

Neither party contests the legal principles governing this case. Rather, the dispute concerns the application of those principles to the specific facts of this case. In analyzing the constitutionality of zoning…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Karches v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Gerijo, Inc. v. City of FairfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Franchise Developers, Inc. v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Moore v. City of MiddletownOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Stetter v. R.J. Corman Derailment Services, L.L.C.Ohio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Shemo v. Mayfield HeightsOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Rose Acre Farms, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  5. Goldberg Companies, Inc. v. Council of the City of Richmond HeightsOhio Supreme Court · 1998

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API