Legal Opinion
Goldberg Companies, Inc. v. Council of the City of Richmond Heights
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided March 11, 1998No. 96-84PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.
We are asked in this case to review the standard for challenging the constitutionality of zoning regulations and, in particular, the off-street parking regulation in the City of Richmond Heights Planning and Zoning Code. The court of appeals, bound by the doctrine of stare decisis, relied upon the two-part conjunctive test set forth in Gerijo, Inc. v. Fairfield (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 223, 638 N.E.2d 533. We take this opportunity to revisit the evolution of this two-part test, and, for the reasons that follow, we modify the syllabus law of Gerijo.
Zoning ordinances, while intrinsically local in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Nectow v. City of CambridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Karches v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Moore v. City of MiddletownOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- State ex rel. Shemo v. City of Mayfield HeightsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State ex rel. BSW Development Group v. City of DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Jaylin Investments, Inc. v. Village of Moreland HillsOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Home Builders Ass'n v. City of BeavercreekOhio Supreme Court · 2000
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.