Legal Opinion

Simpson v. American Oil Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 21, 1941PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSea well, J.

Tbis ease was before the Court at the Spring Term, 1940, and is reported as Simpson v. Oil Co., 217 N. C., 542. A new trial was granted because of error in the instructions to the jury involving the possibility of a double recovery on both theories presented in the pleadings — negligence and breach of warranty. The only important difference between that case and the one at bar is that in the second trial the questions of negligence and implied warranty were eliminated altogether and the case went to the jury solely upon the express warranty printed upon the sealed package in which the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Davis v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. In Re HintonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  3. Harrington v. Rawls.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  4. Simpson v. American Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. State v. . MatthewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mintz v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. State v. LentzSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. State v. . PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. Rayner v. Stauffer Chemical Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  5. Davidson v. WeeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API