State v. Lentz
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtPless, J.
The defendants have presented one case on appeal, but each has filed a separate brief.
The case largely depends upon the identity of the persons who robbed Mrs. Mize. All of the elements of armed robbery are present, and the only seriously contested issue was the question “who did it?” Mrs. Mize, Mabelline Barringer and Herman Stimpson identified the defendants, while the defendant Lentz offered as an alibi that he was at the home of Victoria Carethers at the time, while Mary Rose Young and her two children testified that the defendant Williams was at her home at the time of the robbery.
Even…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. MintonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- State v. BridgersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- State v. MaultsbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
- State v. . SheffieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- State v. SheffieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. YoesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. ChanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. HatcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.