Legal Opinion

Davidson v. Wee

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 8, 1967No. 2 CA-CIV 127PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOLLOY, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered for the defendant after a trial to a jury in a personal injury action in which the plaintiff contends that she was rendered temporarily bald by the use of “Pin-It Waving Lotion,” a permanent-waving solution purchased from the defendant’s grocery store. There has been a previous appeal in the case, which resulted in a reversal of a judgment directed for the defendant, our Supreme Court holding that there was sufficient evidence of a breach of an implied warranty of merchantability to go to a jury. Davidson v. Wee, 93 Ariz. 191, 379 P.2d…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Welker v. Kennecott Copper CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  2. Throop v. FE Young and CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Yoo Thun Lim v. CrespinArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Barefield v. La Salle Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Hardman v. Helene Curtis Industries, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rayner v. Stauffer Chemical Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  2. International Harvester Co. v. ChiarelloCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  3. Brown v. General Foods Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  4. International Harvester Co. v. ChiarelloCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API