State v. . Phillips
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Stacy, O. J.,
after stating tbe facts as above: Tbe State contended on tbe second trial, as well as on tbe first, tbat tbe range of the death bullet plus the absence of powder burns left the theory of suicide with no substantial basis of fact.
In support of this contention, the prosecution had experiments made to determine whether bullets fired from the death pistol at close range would show powder burns on the targets. They did. On cross-examination, one of the officers who made the experiments stated that “the amount of powder in a shell and the type of powder would have right much to do with…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Commonwealth v. TuckerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Arrowood v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
- State v. . HollandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Blue v. Aberdeen & West End RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Shepherd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1931
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. BarfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. FoustSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Robinson v. Seaboard System RR, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. GraysonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.