Legal Opinion
Rayner v. Stauffer Chemical Co.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided June 22, 1978No. 1 CA-CIV 3588PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHROEDER, Presiding Judge.
Appellants, Jack M. Rayner and his wife and son, ranchers, brought this action to recover damages for the destruction of their 1972 and 1973 potato crops. Their complaint, sounding in negligence, strict liability in tort, and breach of an express warranty, alleged that the damages had been caused by Eptam, a herbicide manufactured by appellee, Stauffer Chemical Company, and sold by appellee Chemical Distributors. 1 Appellants’ case was tried before a jury which returned a verdict in favor of the appellees on all three theories of liability.
On appeal,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Guinan v. Famous Players-Lasky Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Chitta R. Nanda, Cross-Appellant v. Ford Motor Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- Tucson Industries, Incorporated v. SchwartzArizona Supreme Court · 1972
- Hardman v. Helene Curtis Industries, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1964
- Midcontinent Broadcasting Company, a Corporation v. North Central Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jones v. Pak-Mor Manufacturing Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Carr v. Suzuki Motor Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
- Potlatch Corp. v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Payne v. M. Greenberg ConstructionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
- Carter v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.