Legal Opinion
Miano v. AC & R Advertising, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 25, 1993No. Nos. 91 Civ. 1280 (LBS), 91 Civ. 1676 (LBS) and 91 Civ. 3906 (LBS)PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KATZ, United States Magistrate Judge.
These cases, consolidated for discovery purposes, involve allegations of age discrimination by three individuals who were terminated by their former employer, AC & R Advertising, Inc. (“AC & R”).1 In support of their case, plaintiffs propose to offer in evidence, for impeachment and admission purposes, tape-recorded conversations which plaintiff Louis Miaño, and in one case, plaintiff Michael Widener, had with employees of AC & R. These recordings were made by Miaño and Widener without the consent or knowledge of the individuals being…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- In Re SnyderSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Niesig v. Team INew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- W. T. Grant Company v. Mark S. Haines, and John A. ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Louise Parrott, Individually and in Her Official Capacity as Administratrix of the Estate of Jeffrey Parrott, Deceased v. Max v. Wilson, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- People v. SantiagoIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
- In re CrossenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
- Gidatex, S.R.L. v. Campaniello Imports, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Staff Mgmt. Grp. LLC v. Feltman (In re Corporate Res. Servs., Inc.)District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Holdren v. General Motors Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1998
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.