Legal Opinion

People v. Santiago

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 2010No. 107391PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas

Chief Justice Fitzgerald and Justices Freeman, Kilbride, Garman, Karmeier, and Burke concurred in the judgment and opinion.

OPINION

At issue in this case is Rule 4.2 of the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct (134 Ill. 2d R. 4.2). Rule 4.2, known as the “no contact” rule, has been amended effective January 1, 2010, but at the relevant time provided that, “[djuring the course of representing a client a lawyer shall not communicate or cause another to communicate on the subject of the representation with a party the lawyer knows to be represented by another lawyer in that matter,” unless…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. K.C.Illinois Supreme Court · 1999
  2. People v. CampbellIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  3. People v. TrainorIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  4. In Re SegallIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Miano v. AC & R Advertising, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. People v. ThompsonIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
  2. People v. GorssIllinois Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Ferris, Thompson & Zweig, Ltd. v. EspositoIllinois Supreme Court · 2018
  4. People v. AdairAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  5. People v. VillaIllinois Supreme Court · 2011

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API