Legal Opinion

Massiah v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 18, 1964No. 199PublishedCited by 3,033 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stewart

The petitioner was indicted for violating the federal narcotics laws. He retained a lawyer, pleaded not guilty, and was released on bail. While he was free on bail a federal agent succeeded by surreptitious means in listening to incriminating statements made by him. Evidence of these statements was introduced against the petitioner at his trial over his objection. He was convicted, and the Court of Appeals affirmed.1 We granted certiorari to *334consider whether, under the circumstances here presented, the prosecution’s use at the trial of evidence of the petitioner’s own incriminating statements…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Hamilton v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3,033 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

3,028 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API