Legal Opinion
W. T. Grant Company v. Mark S. Haines, and John A. Christensen
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 9, 1976No. 446, Docket 75-7385PublishedCited by 129 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MULLIGAN, Circuit Judge:
Once again this court is faced with an appeal from the denial by the district court of a motion to disqualify plaintiff’s counsel. The underlying action was commenced in the Southern District of New York by the appellee W. T. Grant Company (Grant) against thirteen named defendants, including five individuals and eight corporations, to recover damages of approximately 25 million dollars and for injunctive relief. The jurisdiction of the court was invoked under section 4 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. § 15) since the defendants were charged with violations of section 1 of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Hull v. Celanese Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- International Electronics Corp. v. FlanzerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Ceramco, Inc. v. Lee PharmaceuticalsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Silver Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by129 opinions
- Michele E. Shepherd and Larue Graves v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Michael F. Armstrong v. Clovis McAlpinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- In Re American Airlines, Inc., Amr CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Cresswell v. Sullivan & CromwellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Cresswell v. Sullivan & CromwellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
124 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.