Legal Opinion
In re Crossen
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided February 6, 2008PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C.J.
Attorney Gary C. Crossen contests an information filed in the county court by the Board of Bar Overseers (board) recommending that Crossen be disbarred for his part in an intricate plan to discredit a Superior Court judge presiding in an ongoing matter in which he represented some of the litigants. The aim of the plan was to influence the outcome of the litiga*535tian by forcing the judge’s recusal and obtaining reversal of her prior rulings against Crossen’s clients. In furtherance of the scheme, Crossen, with his own investigators posing as corporate executives, set up and secretly made a tape…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
- In re the Enforcement of a SubpoenaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
- Wodinsky v. KettenbachMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2015
- In re JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
- In the Matter of PudloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.