Legal Opinion

United States v. Berri

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided September 30, 1991No. 65,087; CG 921PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

COX, Judge:

The issue before us on certification by the General Counsel, Department of Transportation, concerns the correctness of the Court of Military Review’s determination that certain psychiatric testimony adduced by the defense should have been considered by the factfinders on the question of the accused’s “specific intent.” Art. 67(a)(2), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 867(a)(2)(1989). We hold that the Court of Military Review did not err, and we affirm.

I

The accused was convicted of attempted murder, maiming, and assault intentionally inflicting grievous…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Leland v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. United States v. Karen CameronCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. United States v. MorganUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  2. United States v. MansfieldUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  3. United States v. CurryUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  4. United States v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  5. United States v. KreutzerArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2004

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API