Legal Opinion

Mullaney v. Wilbur

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 9, 1975No. 74-13PublishedCited by 3,258 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Powell

The State of Maine requires a defendant charged with murder to prove that he acted “in the heat of passion on sudden provocation” in order to reduce the homicide to *685manslaughter. We must decide whether this rule comports with the due process requirement, as defined in In re Winship, 397 U. S. 358, 364 (1970), that the prosecution prove beyond a reasonable doubt every fact necessary to constitute the crime charged.

I

In June 1966 a jury found respondent Stillman E. Wilbur, Jr., guilty of murder. The case against him rested on his own pretrial statement and on circumstantial evidence showing that…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Cupp v. NaughtenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3,258 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

3,253 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API