Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Mansfield

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided September 30, 1993No. 67,973; CMR No. 24758PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

COX, Judge:

I

The critical facts of this appeal can be succinctly stated: Appellant made a highly incriminating statement to one of his original trial defense counsel, though he later recanted the incriminating portions of it. This statement, when made, clearly fell within the protection of the attorney-client relationship. Mil.R.Evid. 502, Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1984. Ultimately, the incriminating version of the statement was provided by the defense to various psychiatrists enlisted by the defense to assist in preparation and advancement of an…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. DuBayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  2. Weiss v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. United States v. FisherUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  4. United States v. WeissUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  5. United States v. FrederickUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. United States v. LovingCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1994
  2. Moody v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2011
  3. United States v. SimoyUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996
  4. Ex Parte State of AlabamaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1999
  5. Longval v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API