United States v. Hudnut
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge
Merchandise, consisting of uncolored fluted, lime-glass jars,- each three-sixteenths of a pint in size and used exclusively for the holding and the transportation of talcum powder, was assessed for duty by the collector at the port of New York at 55 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 218 of the Tariff Act of 1922, the pertinent part of which reads as follows:
Par. 218. * * * table and kitchen articles and utensils, and all articles of every description not specially provided for, composed wholly or in chief value of glass or paste, or combinations of glass and paste blown or partly blown in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Post Fish Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- Hensel v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- Scientific Supply Importing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
3Cited by7 opinions
- Riekes Crisa Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1980
- Cellas (Inc.) v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
- Kaysing v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
- United States v. FieldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932
- United States v. FieldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.