Legal Opinion

Kaysing v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 29, 1961No. 65708; protest 58/15962 (St. Louis)Published

1Opinion of the Court

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This protest relates to certain merchandise described on the invoice as “Level vial Units.” It was classified by similitude in use to *505blown glass articles under paragraph 218(f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified, and paragraph 1559, as amended, with a duty assessment at the rate of 30 per centum ad valorem.

Plaintiff’s principal claim is for classification by similitude in use to glass vials, holding less than one-fourth of one pint, under paragraph 217 of the Tariff Act of 1930, and paragraph 1559, as amended, carrying a dutiable rate of 50 cents per gross. Paragraph…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Lilly & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  2. United States v. HudnutCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  3. United States v. SassiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API