Kaysing v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Oliver, Chief Judge:
This protest relates to certain merchandise described on the invoice as “Level vial Units.” It was classified by similitude in use to *505blown glass articles under paragraph 218(f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified, and paragraph 1559, as amended, with a duty assessment at the rate of 30 per centum ad valorem.
Plaintiff’s principal claim is for classification by similitude in use to glass vials, holding less than one-fourth of one pint, under paragraph 217 of the Tariff Act of 1930, and paragraph 1559, as amended, carrying a dutiable rate of 50 cents per gross. Paragraph…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Lilly & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
- United States v. HudnutCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- United States v. SassiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925