United States v. Field

DISSENTING OPINION

GrahaM, Presiding Judge:

I am unable to agree with the majority opinion in this case. To my mind, the imported articles are clearly within the scope of said paragraph 218 (e).

The language involved here is—

Bottles and jars, wholly or in chief value of glass, of the character used or designed to be used as containers of perfume, talcum powder, toilet water, or other toilet preparations.

The lower court has held that the imported articles are not “bottles ” or “jars,” but are bowls and hence do not come within the sub-paragraph. In this view the majority opinion coincides. By…