Legal Opinion

United States v. Field

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided October 30, 1933No. 3623Published

1Opinion of the CourtLenroot, Judge

This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States Customs Court, sustaining the protest of appellee against the classification of certain merchandise, imported at the port of New York, as glass perfume bottles not produced by automatic machinery, and dutiable under paragraph 218 (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930 at 75 per centum ad valorem. Said paragraph reads as follows:

Par. 218 (e). Bottles and jars, wholly or in chief value of glass, of the character used or designed to be used as containers of perfume, talcum powder, toilet water, or other toilet preparations; bottles, vials, and jars,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. HudnutCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API