Legal Opinion

Kinney v. Sando

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1947No. 30168PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

This was an action to recover a real estate broker’s commission. The cause was heard by the court, sitting without a jury, and a judgment was subsequently entered dismissing the action with prejudice. The plaintiff thereupon appealed.

The question which the appellant seeks to present for our decision is this: Where a written agreement, evidenced by an earnest money receipt, between parties designated therein as sellers and purchaser, respectively, was the subject of litigation in a former action brought by the purchaser to obtain specific performance thereof by the sellers, and the agreement…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Grammer v. Skagit Valley Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Irons Investment Co. v. RichardsonWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Fosburgh v. SandoWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Salisbury v. AlskogWashington Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bowman v. WebsterWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Stewart v. HammondWashington Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Robertson v. Club EphrataWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Sherwood B. Korssjoen, Inc. v. HeimanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  5. Bowman v. WebsterWashington Supreme Court · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API