Legal Opinion
Bowman v. Webster
Washington Supreme Court
Decided February 26, 1953No. 32236PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHamley, J.
In this action for specific performance, the vendees of residence property in Seattle ask that the vendors be required to deed to them a certain triangular area adjacent to the land described in the contract and deed. The complaint in effect, though not specifically, also asks for reformation of the contract to include a description of that triangular area. Plaintiffs ask, in the alternative, that they be awarded damages in the sum of four thousand dollars.
*130It is alleged in the complaint that defendants were the owners of certain lots numbered 21, 22, and 23; that lot 21, which adjoined lot 22…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Dunn v. PleseWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Colvin v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Western Dry Goods Co. v. HamiltonWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Harbican v. ChamberlinWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Mertens v. MertensWashington Supreme Court · 1951
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Bowman v. WebsterWashington Supreme Court · 1954
- Daughtry v. Jet Aeration Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
- Maehren v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1979
- Federal Signal Corp. v. Safety Factors, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
- Lian v. StalickCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.