Legal Opinion

Fosburgh v. Sando

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1946No. 29776PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

November 24,1944, R. B. Fosburgh, the purchaser, and Paul Sando, seller, together with G. B. Kinney as agent for the seller, executed an earnest money receipt for the sale to Fosburgh of certain real estate in King county described as “Blue Bird Auto Court, No. 14241, Pacific Highway Legal Description to be inserted” and personal property situated thereon. A description was supplied, and the earnest money receipt, dated November 28,1944, was signed by Paul Sando and wife, as sellers, R. B. Fosburgh, as purchaser, and G. B. Kinney, as agent for the sellers. The pertinent portion of the receipt…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cushing v. Monarch Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Martinson v. CruikshankWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Barth v. BarthWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Groeneveld v. Camano Blue Point Oyster Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Martin v. SeigelWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Bigelow v. MoodWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  3. In Re Estate of VerbeekCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  4. Tenco, Inc. v. ManningWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Custis v. Valley National Bank of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1962

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API