Irons Investment Co. v. Richardson
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.
This is an action to recover upon an alleged written agreement to pay for services ren dered in effecting a sublease of a storeroom. Demurrer to the complaint as amended having been sustained and plaintiff having elected not to plead further, judgment of dismissal was entered. Plaintiff has appealed.
The question before us is whether the amended complaint states a cause of action. The substance of the pleading may be summarized as follows:
On and prior to February 6, 1934, respondent, Loretta M. Eichardson, was, and now is, the owner and holder of a long-term lease covering the Eitel building,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Muir v. KaneWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Davis v. ChipmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Allen v. BrysonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
- Deaton v. LawsonWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Gooch v. GoochWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Ferree v. Doric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
- Hunter v. CunningOregon Supreme Court · 1945
- Lakeview Investments, Inc. v. Alamogordo Lake Village, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
- Manwill v. OylerUtah Supreme Court · 1961
- Opitz v. HaydenWashington Supreme Court · 1943
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.