Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Hammond

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1970No. 41171PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStafford, J.

This is 'an appeal from a judgment of dismissal entered on respondents’ motion at the end of appellant’s case.

Archie Stewart, the appellant, lived in Lewiston, Idaho and pursued the trade of carpentry both in Idaho and nearby Clarkston, Washington. During the time here involved he was not registered as a contractor pursuant to RCW 18.27.

The respondents, Mr. and Mrs. Hammond, engaged appellant to make minor repairs and alterations to their home in Clarkston. It was orally agreed that appellant would furnish 'all labor and procure material necessary for the undertaking. Appellant was to be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Todd v. YelleWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. El Cerrito, Inc. v. RyndakWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Shorewood, Inc. v. StandringWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Kinney v. SandoWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Meyer v. SimpsonWashington Supreme Court · 1949

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Murphy v. Campbell Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Stewart Carpet Service, Inc. v. Contractors Bonding & InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Sumner Development Corporation v. ShiversAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Williamson, Inc. v. Calibre Homes, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Kyle v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 2003

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API