Schroeder v. Wheeler
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
LANDIS, J., pro tem.
The following are the facts as stated in appellant’s brief and appear to substantially cover the controlling facts, to wit:
The defendant, Maude Agnes Mingus Wheeler, was the inventor and manufacturer of a composition hair rinse known as Lavalon Rinsing Powder. Desiring to obtain protection for her invention and for the name “Lavalon”, she filed in the United States patent office two applications, one for a patent on the hair rinse and the other for a trademark on the aforesaid name, which trademark later became involved in an opposition proceeding. Both of these…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pacific Wharf & Storage Co. v. Standard American Dredging Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Estate of WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Blakeslee v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Lane Mortgage Co. v. CrenshawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Jackson v. Puget Sound Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Sperry v. Florida Ex Rel. Florida BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Barham v. BarhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Bump v. District Court of Polk CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
- Cohn v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Chicago Bar Ass'n v. KelloggAppellate Court of Illinois · 1949
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.