Jackson v. Puget Sound Lumber Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. E. W. Risley, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.
This is an action for money had and received to the use of plaintiff. Defendants denied the allegations of the complaint and pleaded a counterclaim for goods sold and delivered. Such being the issue, and the whole issue, made by the pleadings, the superior court, upon and in accordance with a- stipulation of the parties, made and entered the following order in the case: “It is ordered that this action be and it is hereby transferred to Stuart S. Wright, court commissioner, for an accounting; said court commissioner to report back to this court the evidence taken, and the balance found due on…
2Cited by17 opinions
- Cooley v. Miller & LuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Los Angeles City School District v. Landier Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
- Moreing v. WeberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
- County of Marin v. Assessment Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Harris v. KlureCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.