Legal Opinion

Estate of Wood

California Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1902No. S.F. No. 2789PublishedCited by 29 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

This appeal is prosecuted from an order denying appellant’s application for a family allowance, she claiming to be the surviving widow of the deceased, Joseph M. ¡Wood. It is taken on a judgment-roll without the evidence, and the denial of the family allowance was based solely upon the ground that appellant’s marriage with the deceased was a nullity. The appellant, Abbie Rose Wood, and the deceased, Joseph M. Wood, were married at Reno, in the state of Nevada, on January 1, 1898. The marriage was by license, and solemnized in all respects according to the laws of that state. At the date of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Matter of the Estate Op Bernard NewManCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Commonwealth v. LaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  3. In re the Estate of CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Norman v. NormanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. State v. ShattuckSupreme Court of Vermont · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Pereira v. PereiraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Deyoe v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Mohn v. TingleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. In Re the Estate of ElliottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Luick v. ArendsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API