Legal Opinion

Lane Mortgage Co. v. Crenshaw

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 3, 1928No. Docket No. 6169PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, J., pro tem.

In this action plaintiff seeks injunctive relief to secure the benefits to which it alleges itself entitled under a certain written contract. As a part of the same action plaintiff asks the court to declare the legal rights and duties of the respective parties under the said contract.

The court below denied the injunctive relief sought and declined to enter any declaratory judgment.

The plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the lower court and from the order denying its motion for a new trial.

The case presents two main points. We are called upon to determine whether or not…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Rousmanier's AdministratorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
  2. Todd v. Superior Court of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Boehm v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Payne v. NeuvalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Brickell v. Atlas Assurance Co., Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1909

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Bonfigli v. StrachanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Bertero v. National General Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. McCaughna v. BilhornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. State ex rel. Everett Trust & Savings Bank v. Pacific Waxed Paper Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1945

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API