Legal Opinion
In Re Initiative Petition No. 142, State Question No. 205
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 3, 1936No. 26718PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RILEY,. J.
William Cullen Bryant appealed from a finding of the Secretary of State that Initiative Petition No. 142 was insufficient. The. hearing here is de novo. In re Initiative Petition No. 23, 35 Okla. 49, 127 P. 862. By the initiative petition it is sought to submit a in'oposed constitutional amendment: “Authorizing counties, cities, towns, and rural utility districts to incur indebtedness for the purpose of constructing, purchasing, acquiring, imiDroving, extending, enlarging, maintaining and operating public utilities, payable exclusively out of the revenues derived from the operation…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 23, State Question No. 38Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 2 of CushingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Morford v. PyleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
- State v. ButtsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
- Milburn v. State Taxpayers Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 347 State Question No. 639Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 281, St. Question No. 441Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Community Gas and Service Company v. WalbaumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Tyler v. Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
- Oklahomans for Modern Alcoholic Beverage Controls, Inc. v. SheltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.