Legal Opinion
Morford v. Pyle
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided August 10, 1928No. File No. 6700PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPolley, J.
For a number of years last past the unorganized county of Todd has been attached to' Lyman county for state .and judicial purposes. At -the 1927 session of the Legislature, an act known as House Bill No..'69, now chapter 217 of the Session Laws-of 1927, was passed, which in effect attached! Todd, county to Tripp county, instead of Lyman county, for state and judicial purposes. The defendant in this action is the secretary of state. The plaintiff is a freeholder and an elector of Todid county.
On the 31st day of May, 1927, there was filed in the office of the secretary of state a referendum…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. OlcottOregon Supreme Court · 1912
- O'Brien v. PyleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
- Barkley v. PoolNebraska Supreme Court · 1919
- SCHOOL DIST. OF GERING ETC. v. StannardNebraska Supreme Court · 1975
3Cited by35 opinions
- Sturdy v. Hall, Secretary of StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
- Brownlow v. WunschSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
- State Ex Rel. Helgerson v. RiiffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
- Sturdy v. Hall, Secretary of StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
- State ex rel. Commt. for the Referendum of Lorain Ordinance No. 77-01 v. Lorain Cty. Bd. of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.