Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

Oklahomans for Modern Alcoholic Beverage Controls, Inc. v. Shelton

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 11, 1972No. 45410PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERRY, Chief Justice.

The principal question for our determination in this appeal, triable de novo, from the order of the Secretary of State denying sufficiency of the involved initiative petition, hereinafter described, is as to whether a sufficient number of registered legal voters in fact did sign the petition.

The Secretary denied sufficiency of the petition on the ground of its alleged unconstitutionality without referring to the number of valid signatures.

Pursuant to order, hearing was commenced April 5, 1972 to determine factual issues relating to Initiative Petition 288, State Question…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Threadgill v. Cross, Secretary of StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. In Re Initiative Petition No. 142, State Question No. 205Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Milburn v. State Taxpayers Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. In Re Initiative Petition No. 272, State Question No. 409Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  5. In Re Initiative Petitions Nos. 224-226, 228, State Questions Nos. 314-316, 318Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Thomson v. Wyoming In-Stream Flow CommitteeWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  2. In Re Initiative Petition No. 347 State Question No. 639Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  3. In Re Initiative Petition No. 314Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  4. In Re Supreme Court Adjudication of Initiative Petitions in NormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  5. In Re Initiative Petition No. 315, State Question No. 553Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API