Legal Opinion
In Re Initiative Petition No. 2 of Cushing
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 16, 1932No. 22516PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSwindall, J.
This matter was begun by the circulation of an instrument labeled Initiative Petition No. 2, Cushing, Okla|., whereby the petitioners, Doyle Jurney et al., as legal voters of the city of Cushing, Okla., sought to harve submitted to the qualified electors of that city for approval or disapproval a certain franchise according to the terms of which the- Interstate Power Company, a Delaware corporation, was to be granted a franchise for a period of 25 years for the operation of an electric light system in the city of Cushing, Okla. The city of Cushing maintains its city government under a…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Fletcher v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
- Bank of Augusta v. EarleSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- California v. Central Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- State Ex Rel. Caldwell v. Hooker, County JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- State v. OlcottOregon Supreme Court · 1912
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 314Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- In Re Wilson's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1936
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 281, St. Question No. 441Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 379Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 142, State Question No. 205Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.