Legal Opinion
Jostens, Inc. v. Federated Mutual Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 22, 2000No. C9-99-1452PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANCASTER, Justice.
Respondent Jostens Incorporated commenced an action against appellant Federated Mutual Insurance Company in Ramsey County District Court for defense costs and indemnification stemming from chemical contamination at a Jostens operating plant site. Federated subsequently filed a motion for summary judgment. After the court denied this motion, Federated moved the court to certify two questions as “important and doubtful” pursuant to Minn. R. Civ.App. P. 103.03(h) in order to immediately appeal those questions. The court granted Federated’s motion, but the Minnesota…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Herbert Milbert v. Bison Laboratories, Inc., and the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
- A.Y. McDonald Industries, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
- SCSC Corp. v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Gordon v. Microsoft Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Modrow v. JP Foodservice, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Fedziuk v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Davies v. West Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Siewert v. Northern States Power Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.