Legal Opinion

Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 8, 1990No. C4-88-1931, C9-88-2296 and C1-88-2244PublishedCited by 113 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEITH, Justice.

These three cases present certified questions from the federal district court in Minnesota requiring us to decide whether the costs of complying with directives is*177sued by state and federal environmental agencies to clean up groundwater contamination caused by pollution are covered under the insureds’ comprehensive general liability insurance policies.

The cases present similar factual backgrounds. Tonka Corporation (“Tonka”), Joslyn Corporation (“Joslyn”) and Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company (“3M”) have been insured by the various insurance companies involved in these…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Bowen v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Boeing Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Columbia Heights Motors, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. Broadwell Realty Services, Inc. v. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of NYNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
  5. C. D. Spangler Construction Co. v. Industrial Crankshaft & Engineering Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by113 opinions

  1. Outboard Marine Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Morton International, Inc. v. General Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  3. Bausch & Lomb Inc. v. Utica Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  4. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Employers Insurance of WausauWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003

108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API